China

The new Chinese law against unfair competition (UWG 2018)

In 1993, China enacted its Unfair Competition Law (UWG). Since then, laws on trademark law, advertising law and Antitrust Law have emerged in China. This has resulted in various overlaps with the Unfair Competition Act 1993, which have been eliminated by the Unfair Competition Act 2018. In addition, some new provisions have been included to

The new Chinese law against unfair competition (UWG 2018) Read More »

Invalidity of Utility Model due to ambiguity (Beijing High Court – Bo Wanqing v. Jining Weikei Materials et al.)

In principle, the Patent Application is free to choose the terminology it uses in the patent claim. It is important that the terms used are either clear to the person skilled in the art or that they are explained in the description. However, if neither the description nor the general understanding of the skilled person

Invalidity of Utility Model due to ambiguity (Beijing High Court – Bo Wanqing v. Jining Weikei Materials et al.) Read More »

Risk of Confusion between Word and Figurative Marks (Beijing High Court – SMURF)

Assessing the Risk of Confusion between a Word Mark and a figurative mark is generally difficult. Is the image generally associated with a term and is this term confusable with the Word Mark? In the SMURF dispute, the Beijing High Court answered this question in favor of protecting the figurative mark. The first comic figures

Risk of Confusion between Word and Figurative Marks (Beijing High Court – SMURF) Read More »

Rules of the Chinese Supreme People’s Court for the adjudication of trademark disputes in administrative proceedings

In terms of rights and obligations, Chinese trademark law is broadly similar to European trademark law. However, it has only existed in this form for about 15 years. The last improvement to the law was only 4 years ago. In order to make it easier for the courts to interpret certain legal terms, the Supreme

Rules of the Chinese Supreme People’s Court for the adjudication of trademark disputes in administrative proceedings Read More »

Damages for trademark infringement (3M v. Huawei)

In the event of a trademark infringement, the trademark owner’s main interest lies in stopping the infringer’s unlawful acts of use. However, because the legal proceedings and restoring the integrity of the infringed Trademarks costs money, the infringer should also pay compensation. However, the Chinese trademark law sets limits on the amount of compensation. The

Damages for trademark infringement (3M v. Huawei) Read More »

Examination of the admissibility of claim amendments (Supreme People’s Court Xingtizi 21/2013)

The principle that the application documents may be amended during the Examination Proceedings also applies in China. However, according to Art. 33 of the Chinese Patent Law, amendments may not go beyond the scope of the original description and claims. In a recent decision, the Supreme People’s Court opposed the strict practice of the Boards

Examination of the admissibility of claim amendments (Supreme People’s Court Xingtizi 21/2013) Read More »

Scroll to Top